-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nathan L. Adams wrote: | What I see with Gentoo is this 'cathedral' being built where only those | folks who have been 'approved' or 'blessed' as being l33t enough are | allowed to review the code and actually cause a positive change when | some bug is found. If you believe Chris Gianelloni's argument, then only | those blessed developers who are also blessed by a particular group | within Gentoo are allowed. Eventually the meritocracy degrades into a | popularity contest.
Our code is all available in the portage tree or ViewCVS, and so are all the ebuild bugs in Bugzilla. Nobody's stopping anybody else from reviewing any submissions or filing new bugs. It's just a question of who makes (and therefore approves of) the actual commit. I don't see where your cathedral is coming from. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDCFE8XVaO67S1rtsRAus4AJ9KFE6sGcSR+zOcWHMcvSSi3y6nPwCbB6ZG J3Tkx0jpntLr+B7fPy5RQfw= =mLzH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
