On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:03:18 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > wrote: | > | > Because that won't help in the slightest. | > | | > | So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing | > | things by default is bad? Explain? | > | > No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp | > of approval upon bug closures is worthless. | | So you're problem isn't with the peer review I'm proposing but instead | quality of work of the team leads?
Not at all. I'm saying that a) most 'team leads' will not do proper checks because they don't have time to and b) the limited time that 'team leads' have is better spent elsewhere. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpqQvx8TfOak.pgp
Description: PGP signature
