-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Because that won't help in the slightest. > | > | So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing things > | by default is bad? Explain? > > No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp of > approval upon bug closures is worthless. >
So you're problem isn't with the peer review I'm proposing but instead quality of work of the team leads? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDBzgm2QTTR4CNEQARAvaCAJwJO5BrCK+yG57+yxa4TI2gN9zT6ACdEjPP 7S5TQ9d236Oo1Lkln/9QziY= =39QI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
