Rod, We did consider prefixed versions. We also understand and agree that technically prefix works. There is discomfort among us with regards to using prefixes. Based on community discussions, I prefer to keep the ask for separate jiras. If during incubation approval, this becomes a blocker, we will reconsider the ask for separate jiras.
Thks, Amol On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Rob Vesse <rve...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote: > Not really an issue > > JIRA allows a lot of flexibility in the configuration of Versions (I.e. > the version strings are free text) so you could easily have "Apex x.y.z" > and "Malhar x.y.z" as separate versions under a single JIRA key. It just > needs the community managing the JIRA to be careful about ensuring issues > are tagged with the correct Affects and Fix Versions as necessary > > We've used this workflow for years in the Jena project and not had an > issue with it. > > Of course the community may prefer to have separate JIRA keys as appears > to be the case here in which case I see no reason not to allow them that > and there are other precedents for that (e.g. Apache Commons) > > Rob > > On 11/08/2015 18:03, "Chris Nauroth" <cnaur...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > >One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to specific > >JIRA projects. If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version numbers to > >be independent, then using a single JIRA project could introduce some risk > >of confusion if an Apex version number accidentally gets applied to a > >Malhar issue. It might necessitate prefixing the version numbers with > >"apex-" and "malhar-" to differentiate. > > > >Based on that, I have a slight preference for separate JIRA projects. > >However, I don't object to using a single unified JIRA project if others > >feel strongly about it. > > > >--Chris Nauroth > > > > > > > > > >On 8/11/15, 8:23 AM, "Amol Kekre" <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > > > >>Ted, > >>I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up > >>your > >>suggesstion with folks and should get back soon. > >> > >>Thks > >>Amol > >> > >>On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git > >>> repos. Having all jiras under APEX seems a good choice. > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> > On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:32, Bertrand Delacretaz > >>><bdelacre...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > As for JIRA, I would apply the same rule, so APX-CORE and APX-MHAR > >>>maybe. > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
