If there isn’t a char limit on project names in JIRA, wouldn’t it just be better to use “APEX-CORE” and “APEX-MALHAR” to match the actual project names, repos, etc?
thanks — Hitesh On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > Chris, > Thanks for articulating what I was going to respond with after talking to > folks here. We indeed see versions for Malhar and Apex differing. We expect > Malhar versions to change much more rapidly than Apex. > > Ted, > We discussed the impact of single jira on versioning. For example we > expect Malhar X.0.0 to happen much earlier than Apex X.0.0. There was > discomfort in naming versions with prefix. The consensus was to have > version numbers convey stuff. If folks don't have strong opinion on two > jiras, we would prefer to use two jiras. We have taken up Bertrand's scope > naming and changed the names of jira projects as follows > > APX-CORE > APX-MLHR > > I have changed the wiki to reflect the above as jira project names. > > Thks, > Amol > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > >> One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to specific >> JIRA projects. If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version numbers to >> be independent, then using a single JIRA project could introduce some risk >> of confusion if an Apex version number accidentally gets applied to a >> Malhar issue. It might necessitate prefixing the version numbers with >> "apex-" and "malhar-" to differentiate. >> >> Based on that, I have a slight preference for separate JIRA projects. >> However, I don't object to using a single unified JIRA project if others >> feel strongly about it. >> >> --Chris Nauroth >> >> >> >> >> On 8/11/15, 8:23 AM, "Amol Kekre" <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote: >> >>> Ted, >>> I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up your >>> suggesstion with folks and should get back soon. >>> >>> Thks >>> Amol >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git >>>> repos. Having all jiras under APEX seems a good choice. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:32, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As for JIRA, I would apply the same rule, so APX-CORE and APX-MHAR >>>> maybe. >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
