Hi Guys, So I spent some time this weekend updating my scripts. They now fully process missing ticks as well. Here is the list they generated of mentors from January 2012 - August 2014 that did *not* sign off on a report (note I'm at the top, bad mentor Chris). The results are a LOT better for wiki reports with the [ ] mentor name (id) pattern - for those old "Signed off by mentor:" patterns, my tool cannot sniff them (in the negative) since if they didn't sign off, I don't know who was supposed to. I suppose I could have cross reffed the mentor list for the podling at the time, but another day, another dollar :) Here you go, for now. To replicate:
1. git clone https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff 2. cd apachestuff 3. ./incubator_mentor_tally (note you'll need to install Apache Tika into /usr/local/tika and then alias it to "tika"): 25 mattmann 23 omalley 21 acmurthy 19 olamy 19 ddas 15 jbonofre 14 mnour 13 antelder 11 hgomez 10 mfranklin 10 gates 10 asavory 10 akarasulu 9 jim 9 cdouglas 8 tdunning 8 hashutosh 8 benh 8 asavu 7 tomwhite 7 mahadev 7 jukka 6 struberg 6 rubys 6 nslater 5 yegor 5 vanto 5 tomdz 5 sanjiva 5 radup 5 pramirez 5 ke4qqq 5 craigmcc 4 stevenn 4 srowen 4 snoopdave 4 smarru 4 rgardler 4 pauls 4 niq 4 nick 4 mpierce 4 marrs 4 kevan 4 jzb 4 enis 4 cutting 4 chipchilders 4 ahart 3 vkaggal 3 rvs 3 rbircher 3 lresende 3 jochen 3 hogstrom 3 henning 3 gstein 3 grobmeier 3 clr 2 tomaz 2 thorsten 2 mriou 2 larsh 2 jghoman 2 isabel 2 humbedooh 2 dkulp 2 carlos 2 brianm 2 berndf 2 ate 2 arvind 1 white 1 vinodkv 1 todd 1 thomas 1 nandana 1 lewismc 1 jfarrell 1 hsaputra 1 fchrist 1 dennisl 1 azeez 1 apurtell ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:59 PM To: "<general@incubator.apache.org>" <general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat >Try out my scripts - they take on that precise philosophy and try to make >sense of what is already there > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:54 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> >>wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> I've been too busy to do more than lurk occasionally. Consequently I am >>not mentoring and not shepherding lately. >> >> I do want to add something to this debate. PMCs write their board >>reports to the board in whatever way they want. The Incubator is about >>teaching PPMCs how to become PMCs. We can make it easy for our purposes, >>but we don't need to add more tooling and process to being a Podling. >>Doing such may serve the IPMC, but it may harm our clutch of podlings. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> On Aug 24, 2014, at 11:07 AM, jan i wrote: >>> >>>> On 24 August 2014 19:54, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report. >>>>> >>>>> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board >>>> report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as >>>>that >>>> afforded incubator reports. >>>> >>>> If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they >>>>would >>>> not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g. >>>>release >>>> voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc. >>> I think you forget one important factor...the human one, to make the >>>board >>> reports in yaml, we need to convince the board, and I not convinced >>>they >>> have a futuristic view as you have. You might also find, just a small >>> number of course, people who resist to using svn and want git, so we >>>might >>> end up with split data. >>> >>> But I do agree with your POW, and would like to more automated >>>processes. >>> >>> rgds >>> jan i. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
