On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > On 24 August 2014 19:54, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report. >> > >> > What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board >> report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as that >> afforded incubator reports. >> >> If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they would >> not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g. release >> voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc. >> > I think you forget one important factor...the human one, to make the board > reports in yaml, we need to convince the board, and I not convinced they > have a futuristic view as you have. You might also find, just a small > number of course, people who resist to using svn and want git, so we might > end up with split data.
It's not a problem. We turn yaml into prose with a template! The board will never know ... actually, really, I think that the board will be fine with some information in yaml. > > But I do agree with your POW, and would like to more automated processes. > > rgds > jan i. > >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
