On 25 August 2014 19:26, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just want to point out that lack of activity may mean lack of issues > that need dealing with not that a mentor gone awol. > > Right. And that's why technical side of things (like YAMLizing report, > etc.) is > a prerequisite for enabling us to track things like AWOL and react > accordingly. > > On that note, how about if we *at least* start tracking mentor signing off > on the reports? IOW, we will make it mandatory for *all* mentors (not just > one) to read/sign off, with an assumption that if that minimum level of > activity couldn't be detected -- there's clearly something not quite right. > +1
> > We can then, start tracking missed sign off in the Mentor Activity section > of the report. If we have somebody who hasn't showed up for a 3 straight > month -- that's when IPMC would try to intervene. > hmmm "try to intervene" sound a bit hard. After 3 month, I would prefer, mailing the mentor in question, with a reminder of the duties, and take it from there (maybe that is what you are thinking, I just want to rule out hard intervention). rgds jan i > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
