On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 03/06/2011 16:43, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> >>> Please see Simon Phipps' email earlier today that contained a very similar >>> suggestion with some more detail, it would be nice to bring these two >>> threads together. >>> >> >> Simon's email, from what I can tell, boils down to: >> >> 1. The podling goes along as suggested. >> 2. The TDF continues business as usual. > > > I read it differently and more like what was proposed in this thread. > > The podling goes along as suggested and TDF continues to provide essential > support to existing users of the the end user product that is currently > called OpenOffice.org to some and LibreOffice to others). >
But what of the *development* of the code? If business-as-usual is both sides independently developing the codebase, then how does that address what is, I guess, a main issue? Is the idea that the ASF contribute code which is then consumed by TDF and that any patches to TDF remain unaccessible to the ASF? Does this result in the communities driving closer together or farther apart? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
