Hi Jeremy, Since you are asking about potential committers - at least to me a new OSGi project focused on Java EE sounds quite interesting.
Btw, when looking at the proposal I would personally suggest even to expand the scope and include other Java enterprise concepts - for example integration with JMS (i.e. ActiveMQ) , JCA resource adapters , or addressing the usecase for integration of non-Apache Java EE components (EclipseLink, etc.). Would you consider these as in scope for the project ? Best Regards Peter Peshev On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Hughes<hugh...@apache.org> wrote: > Cross-pollination and help from the Felix community have been talked > about several times and I absolutely welcome that. As such, please > would Felix committers willing to spend time helping the (proposed) > Aries podling add their names to the initial committer list on the > proposal wiki [1]. This naturally extends beyond Felix committers. > > Apologies for x-post to d...@felix ... I wanted to attract as many as > possible :-) > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriesProposal > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > 2009/9/5 Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>: >> Karl, >> >> Please don't get me wrong. Felix is choice for an excellent *destination* >> TLP. The Incubator PMC itself was setup to take away the responsibility for >> training incoming folks from existing TLP(s). So my gut feeling is that we >> should allow the incubation process to go on and decide on destination and >> scope once the project is ready to graduate. I am sure the folks on the >> proposal would love to get any and every help they can get to graduate as >> well as on the technical front. Please do continue to provide help and >> guidance. >> >> thanks, >> dims >> >> On 09/05/2009 10:29 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Karl, >>>> >>>> There are *many* TLP(s) with overlapping scope as James Strachan pointed >>>> out >>>> earlier in the thread. >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't see the need to shoe horn a new community with new code into an >>>> existing TLP just because of scope. For all you know by the time they get >>>> out of the incubator their scope may change a bit (or more). >>> >>> I'm sorry if it looked like I wanted to shoe horn anything into felix. >>> That wasn't my goal as for me it was a question of where I would like >>> it to happen and as I said earlier already, not the end of the world >>> if not. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Karl >>> >>>> thanks, >>>> dims >>>> >>>> On 09/05/2009 04:31 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The question >>>>> is about the scope and goals of Aries and more specifically about the >>>>> part where it is about being an umbrella for OSGi EE spec >>>>> implementations where it has been argued that this could/should be >>>>> done at felix >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
