Hi Peter,
Excellent! I am hoping that the champions - in this case Kevan Miller and
Guillaume Nodet - will chime in on next steps.
thanks,
dims
On 09/09/2009 01:45 PM, Peter Peshev wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
We from SAP would like to join and nominate six people for the
proposed Aries project. What's the process - should I just add the six
names on the wiki ? Maybe we could discuss this offline to not spam
the whole mailing list.
Unfortunately none of the suggested people from our side has
experience in Apache project , but I hope that’s not an issue.
Best Regards
Peter Peshev
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Hughes<hugh...@apache.org> wrote:
Cross-pollination and help from the Felix community have been talked
about several times and I absolutely welcome that. As such, please
would Felix committers willing to spend time helping the (proposed)
Aries podling add their names to the initial committer list on the
proposal wiki [1]. This naturally extends beyond Felix committers.
Apologies for x-post to d...@felix ... I wanted to attract as many as
possible :-)
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriesProposal
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/5 Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com>:
Karl,
Please don't get me wrong. Felix is choice for an excellent *destination*
TLP. The Incubator PMC itself was setup to take away the responsibility for
training incoming folks from existing TLP(s). So my gut feeling is that we
should allow the incubation process to go on and decide on destination and
scope once the project is ready to graduate. I am sure the folks on the
proposal would love to get any and every help they can get to graduate as
well as on the technical front. Please do continue to provide help and
guidance.
thanks,
dims
On 09/05/2009 10:29 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Karl,
There are *many* TLP(s) with overlapping scope as James Strachan pointed
out
earlier in the thread.
I don't see the need to shoe horn a new community with new code into an
existing TLP just because of scope. For all you know by the time they get
out of the incubator their scope may change a bit (or more).
I'm sorry if it looked like I wanted to shoe horn anything into felix.
That wasn't my goal as for me it was a question of where I would like
it to happen and as I said earlier already, not the end of the world
if not.
regards,
Karl
thanks,
dims
On 09/05/2009 04:31 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
The question
is about the scope and goals of Aries and more specifically about the
part where it is about being an umbrella for OSGi EE spec
implementations where it has been argued that this could/should be
done at felix
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
