Hi, On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Ralph Goers<ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Using these projects as an example is perhaps not the best from a community > perspective because Ceki has no intention of running them like Apache > projects. But even if he did, by these standards the projects might never > make it out of the incubator. Even if those of us who would like them had > commit rights I can guarantee that 95% of the commits would still be Ceki's.
I don't see it as a problem if the vast majority of commits comes from one person (or company) as long as the community operates normally *and* there are others who won't have to start learning how to build the codebase and do an "svn commit" if the key developer leaves. That's why I measure the "three independent committers" criteria by looking at the commit log instead of the asf-authorization file. And I'm not asking much, just a few code commits in the past few months is good enough for me. That's the criteria that I held Sling against, and that's also what's currently keeping UIMA from graduating (and apparently also for over a year before I signed up to help them). If the consensus is that this is a bit too hard a requirement, then I'll be happy to bring UIMA up for graduation in the next few months. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
