2009/8/5 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>: > > On Aug 4, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Bertrand >> Delacretaz<bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> In such a case, the key point is, do the people who write the code >>> listen to the community? >> >> That's certainly good, but [snip]
... >> Besides all the other good things diversity brings it's also an >> insurance policy for the project, and that's what I think the >> Incubator should be looking for as a graduation criteria. >> > > You are trying to predict the future. Good luck with that. ... > From my perspective we should be evaluating projects based on whether they > are building a healthy Apache community where we have sufficient belief that > the project will be able to sustain itself without further mentoring. > +1 a) is there sufficient oversight in the project? b) will the community actively seek more contributors? c) does the community know what it knows about the ASF (i.e. will it ask in unusual circumstances)? d) have the mentors been active in their mentoring and recommend graduation? If yes to all these points then we should graduate the project. Ross -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
