On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:28 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14/04/2009, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > To clarify: do you mean Sanselan could "graduate" into Commons? >> > Commons adopts the Sanselan codebase and active committers, upon a >> > vote of the Incubator and in particular of the project's mentors. >> > >> > Sounds like a plan to me: accept smallish projects into the incubator, >> > but give them the option to graduate to Commons instead of becoming a >> > full-blown project, if their community does not grow enough. >> > >> > And projects too small for this should go directly to Commons, >> > starting with grants/patches which help their authors become >> > committers. >> >> >> +1. Sounds good to me. >> > > +1, provided that the project fits in with Commons goal(s). > > -1, if Commons is just used as a dumping ground for small projects.
Agreed, I didn't mean to imply that Commons *has* to accept such projects, it's Commons' call. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
