I'll let Noel reply back to this, just to be sure :) On 3/16/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think he is talking about having/needing a separate download for > > ServiceMix irrespective of whether an incubating jar is in Geronimo or > > not. > > Basically if one needs servicemix, they get a whole package that has > > incubating all over it. Same with derby, if someone needed derby they > > won't download Geronimo. > > > They will download Derby. Does not mean that > > derby jar should not be in Geronimo. It could be, but needs to be > > marked properly (incubating sth or other in the jar name) > > > So we could include the incubating ActiveMQ code inside an actual production > Geronimo release - provided the ActiveMQ jars keep (their current name) of > incubator-activemq.jar? If so thats great, we can start integrating the > Apache ActiveMQ code into Geronimo ASAP - yay! > > > One more question then... ActiveMQ 4.0 is long overdue - I get asked when > its gonna be released everyday by someone somewhere :). We were originally > hoping to release it last year when most of the development was done but > then the incubation process started and we've been treading water a little > waiting until we thought we could actually ship some release candidates then > the full 4.0 GA. (Which is why there's not been as much developer discussion > as last year; we've mostly been in bug fix mode for months waiting until we > can release 4.0). > > > Up to now I'd thought we could only do a 4.0 release after leaving the > incubator. I remember last time I looked the incubator policy talked in > terms that podlings could only do "milestone" releases. Though I just reread > the policy document > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html > > and it doesn't seem to even mention that world any more. So I guess that > means we could go ahead and start trying to do the 4.0-RC-* releases and try > get the full 4.0 release out - provided the Incubator PMC approves the > release and we release the code as "incubator-activemq" with all the > necessary disclaimers to avoid any confusion & to ensure users are aware the > code is still in the incubator. > > Is this correct or have I got the wrong end of the stick again? :) > > -- > > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
