Hi Henri, I think a good example of why not just a shoe in is because when the ServiceMix and ActiveMQ apache commiter list was created, it included all previous commiters to the project. But 100% of committers may not have been active during the period of the incubation. All though the projects trusted those individuals enough in the past to give them commit privileges, perhaps the TLP PMC may want to see more recent activity to evaluate if they truly 'get' the Apache way.
Regards, Hiram On 3/15/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Noel, > > > > If the ActiveMQ / ServiceMix community do decide to go under some > > other TLP, I'm sure it would not take long for the active > > participants of the community to asked to Join the TLP's PMC. It > > would behoove that PMC to include such active community participants > > in the decision making proccess. > > Interesting reply - I'd been assuming that when an incubatee graduates > into an existing project, it's PPMC automatically get added to the > PMC. So I was a bit confused as to why Noel was even asking the > question. > > > Furthermore, I believe that merging ActiveMQ and Servicemix into > > Geronimo community and PMC is easier than most cases since there are > > all ready several active ActiveMQ/ServiceMix commiters thar are > > Geronimo PMC members. Those PMC memebers can help propose and vouch > > for additional commiters to join the PMC. > > Yeah, overlap would help. Still surprised that it's not just a shoe-in. > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Regards, Hiram --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
