On 3/16/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > I believe that merging ActiveMQ and Servicemix into Geronimo > > community and PMC is easier than most cases since there are > > all ready several active ActiveMQ/ServiceMix commiters thar > > are Geronimo PMC members. > > At this moment, Geronimo has 19 PMC members and 7 commmiters who are not > on > the PMC. That does, of course, change over time. > > The overlap of ActiveMQ and ServiceMix with the Geronimo PMC has 10 PMC > members. ActiveMQ has 13 additional people who are not on the Geronimo > PMC. > Adding ServiceMix is just another 4 (17 total), as there is a huge overlap > between ActiveMQ and ServiceMix. > > I have no idea how active any of these people are on any of the projects > in > any capacity. Dims appears to feel that there is a large number of > committers in name only, but I haven't looked at all so for the sake of > discussion, let's assume that they are all active.
To give some concrete numbers; ActiveMQ currently has 20 committers; 15 have been active so far during incubation. Though most of those 5 (apart from Brian :) are Geronimo committers who tend to work on ActiveMQ as part of its integration into Geronimo (e.g. David Jencks, Dain, Aaron etc). i.e. they tend to work on integration issues with Geronimo as their primary involvement. Note that we are apparently not allowed to use the incubating ActiveMQ inside Geronimo until it leaves incubation http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/200602.mbox/browser which is why some of the Geronimo folks haven't been active hacking on ActiveMQ to fix it (as we don't yet know whats broke :). As soon as we start integrating the Apache ActiveMQ codebase into Geronimo I'm sure those guys will get active fast; though if this restriction is true, then they can only really contribute after incubation is over which is very unfortunate. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
