Stephen McConnell wrote: > > I'll "knock it off" when there are a sufficiently complete set of > policies and procedures in place (i.e. documented and adopted) such that > the need for Member status is clearly identified as the legal aspect of > representation of the Foundation (and/or any other quantifiable and > accountable attribute this forum sees fit to attribute).
that's a reasonable goal. claiming 'the self-perpetuating members club strikes again' is not only unreasonable and completely irrelevant, but insulting as well. *that* is the part i want you to stop. it contributes nothing afaics, and is in fact destructive. > With such a framework in place the necessity for particular "Members" to > discriminate between Member versus non-Member as a justification for the > decision on policy simply disappears. So lets "knock it off" with the > "knock it off" and focus instead on getting roles, responsibilities and > ultimate accountability of the Incubator in place. that has been my focus all along, except when i have been drawn into side issues by your handwaving. > How about you? how about me what? i've been contributing, defending, suggesting, and considering the issues all along. at this point i refuse to be sucked any further into one of your confusions. -- #ken P-(} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
