Stephen McConnell wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > >> Ah, at the end, if a committer considers this unfair, maybe he/she >> should question him/herself before questioning hundreds of his/her peers. > > Umm, .... > > ... and the "standard member line" gets rolled out once again > to justify the absence of incubator documentation, process, > policy, and accountability.
stephen, this carp of yours is really starting to get up my nose. stefano did nothing of the sort; here's the *whole* part of his message which you conveniently snipped: > There is no policy yet, but if the incubator was to make a policy, I > would be against having an ASF committer which is not a member or > officer being an incubating sponsor. > > Why? simple enough. If that person was believed good for the job by > his/her peers, he would have been already a member or an officer. Or, > his/her action would make him/her visible for the next election, if > deserved. > > Ah, at the end, if a committer considers this unfair, maybe he/she > should question him/herself before questioning hundreds of his/her > peers. there's nothing in there making the least attempt to justify anything about the incubator. it's a statement of stefano's opinion of how he'd feel *if* a particular policy were developed, and why he feels that way. so, please: knock it off. -- #ken P-(} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
