Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

Isn't that a no no?

The board is discussing this.

What scares the crap out of me is the weasel words. "intent to offer royalty free...".

As a rule, lawyers are very careful in what they say and do not say. I can only presume that the word "intent" was carefully chosen.

I think there was something (maybe on slashdot) recently about "letters of intent". The conclusion seemed to be that they are pretty much meaningless and unenforceable.

Conor



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to