Re: OpenSAML VOTE Results (was Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenSAML as partof Web Services )

[Andrew C. Oliver]

Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. However if I take this back to my company (outside of Apache) I must then seek another license which by intent (though not by agreement) would again be Royalty free?
-Andy

Scott Cantor wrote:

Below is what seems the last mail on this subject on this list. Reading that, I tend to think that the incubator, at this point, is capable of taking a formal position on this matter, and we
should probably ask the board.

RSA posted a new statement on the SSTC web site and confirmed the intent to offer royalty free licenses to anyone building a
toolkit, and stating the builder's obligation to inform users that they also must obtain a license, so that's the situation.

The license itself is still not available, and I would be surprised if it showed up all that soon, frankly.

-- Scott


------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]