Isn't that a no no?
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Andrew,
IANAL...But I think you are right.
Thanks,
dims
--- "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm
free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. However
if I take this back to my company (outside of Apache) I must then seek
another license which by intent (though not by agreement) would again be
Royalty free?
-Andy
Scott Cantor wrote:
Below is what seems the last mail on this subject on this
list. Reading that, I tend to think that the incubator, at
this point, is capable of taking a formal position on this matter, and we
should probably ask the board.
RSA posted a new statement on the SSTC web site and confirmed the intent to offer royalty free
licenses to anyone building a
toolkit, and stating the builder's obligation to inform users that they also must obtain a
license, so that's the situation.
The license itself is still not available, and I would be surprised if it showed up all that
soon, frankly.
-- Scott
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
