Andrew, IANAL...But I think you are right.
Thanks, dims --- "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm > free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. However > if I take this back to my company (outside of Apache) I must then seek > another license which by intent (though not by agreement) would again be > Royalty free? > > -Andy > > Scott Cantor wrote: > > >>Below is what seems the last mail on this subject on this > >>list. Reading that, I tend to think that the incubator, at > >>this point, is capable of taking a formal position on this matter, and we > >>should probably ask the board. > >> > >> > > > >RSA posted a new statement on the SSTC web site and confirmed the intent to offer >royalty free > licenses to anyone building a > >toolkit, and stating the builder's obligation to inform users that they also must >obtain a > license, so that's the situation. > > > >The license itself is still not available, and I would be surprised if it showed up >all that > soon, frankly. > > > >-- Scott > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
