gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [CAUTION - External Sender] Re: gcc relies on RISC-V vcompress instruction undefined behaviour Anton Blanchard via Gcc
• GCC (GNU Toolchain) dev room - CFP Marc via Gcc
  • FOSDEM 2025 GCC (GNU Toolchain) devroom (was: GCC (GNU Toolchain) dev room - CFP) Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC (GNU Toolchain) dev room - CFP Huy Nguyễn Hoàng via Gcc
• Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Karen M. Sandler via Gcc
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Core Toolchain Infrastructure - October 2024 update Mark Wielaard
• Re: School Districts Contacts 2024 madison wright via Gcc
  • Re: School Districts Contacts 2024 Abigail Foster via Gcc
• gcc-15-20241027 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241026 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• examples of (so called) time-travel optimisations in GCC? Iain Sandoe
  • Re: examples of (so called) time-travel optimisations in GCC? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: examples of (so called) time-travel optimisations in GCC? Martin Uecker via Gcc
• Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator mirabilos
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v17 2/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Thorsten Glaser
• C Tommy Centeno via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241025 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Introduction and Interest in GSOC 2025 Nainika Reddy Vempalli via Gcc
  • Re: Introduction and Interest in GSOC 2025 Martin Jambor
  • Re: Introduction and Interest in GSOC 2025 Nainika Reddy Vempalli via Gcc
  • Re: Introduction and Interest in GSOC 2025 Martin Jambor
• feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
• [no subject] gg g via Gcc
• [no subject] Tzxstiy via Gcc
• Sourceware forge experiment Mark Wielaard
  • Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Mark Wielaard
• gcc-15-20241020 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic Olive Clinton via Gcc
• [no subject] Emiliano Soares via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241019 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241018 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Douglas McIlroy via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Douglas McIlroy via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Jason Merrill via Gcc
• [RFC][AArch64] Defining lrotm3 optabs for SVE modes for TARGET_SVE2? Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC][AArch64] Defining lrotm3 optabs for SVE modes for TARGET_SVE2? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC][AArch64] Defining lrotm3 optabs for SVE modes for TARGET_SVE2? Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• Alex Coplan appointed maintainer of AArch64 pair fusion pass and pair-fusion pass. Ramana Radhakrishnan via Gcc
  • Re: Alex Coplan appointed maintainer of AArch64 pair fusion pass and pair-fusion pass. Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Alex Coplan appointed maintainer of AArch64 pair fusion pass and pair-fusion pass. Alex Coplan via Gcc
• How to remove extra assembly code Ericxu833--- via Gcc
  • Re: How to remove extra assembly code Nick Clifton via Gcc
  • Re: How to remove extra assembly code LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: How to remove extra assembly code" LIU Hao via Gcc
• gcc14.2 gprbuild not provided Berger, Lutz via Gcc
  • Re: gcc14.2 gprbuild not provided Marc Poulhiès via Gcc
• Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Richard Biener via Gcc
• Linaro CI new feature: skip precommit testing Christophe Lyon via Gcc
• C23 status on cppreference Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Florian Weimer
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Florian Weimer
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Joseph Myers via Gcc
• C Standard Libraries Bryon Quackenbush via Gcc
  • Re: C Standard Libraries Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
  • Re: C Standard Libraries Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Andrew Stubbs
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Andrew Stubbs
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
• GCC 15.0.0 Status Report (2024-10-14), Stage 1 ends Nov 17th Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-15-20241013 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241012 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241011 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Android: Fix build for Android yxj-github-437 via Gcc
  • Re: Android: Fix build for Android Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• c99 does not handle -O2 but cc does? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: c99 does not handle -O2 but cc does? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: c99 does not handle -O2 but cc does? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
• Suggest: Add curl to gcc/install/prerequisites Roosh Fourtytwo via Gcc
  • Re: Suggest: Add curl to gcc/install/prerequisites Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Suggest: Add curl to gcc/install/prerequisites Roosh Fourtytwo via Gcc
• gcc-12-20241010 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office Friday 16:00 UTC, A forge experiment? Mark Wielaard
• [no subject] Zhang Zhang via Gcc
• Educational question on compiling (analyzing) the C programming language Laurent Cimon via Gcc
  • Re: Educational question on compiling (analyzing) the C programming language Florian Weimer
  • Re: Educational question on compiling (analyzing) the C programming language Andreas Schwab via Gcc
• Why are profile-implied niters capped at 99? Alex Coplan via Gcc
• gcc-15-20241006 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241005 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241004 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Assembly-level peepholes? Sid Maxwell via Gcc
  • Re: Assembly-level peepholes? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Assembly-level peepholes? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
• gcc-12-20241003 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Florian Weimer
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Paul Eggert
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Florian Weimer
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Qing Zhao via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Qing Zhao via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Qing Zhao via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Chris Bazley via Gcc
• Where does this dead statement generated in switch conversion come from? Filip Kastl
  • Re: Where does this dead statement generated in switch conversion come from? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Where does this dead statement generated in switch conversion come from? Filip Kastl
• n3365 New _Lengthof operator (v4) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • n3369 New _Lengthof operator (v4) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3369 New _Lengthof operator (v4) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Georg-Johann Lay
  • RE: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Tamar Christina via Gcc
  • Re: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Georg-Johann Lay
  • RE: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Tamar Christina via Gcc
• How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Andi Kleen via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? James K. Lowden
  • GCC (GNU Toolchain) devroom at FOSDEM 2025! (was: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025?) Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? James K. Lowden
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Marc Poulhiès via Gcc
• Sourceware infrastructure updates for Q3 2024 Mark Wielaard
• Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus appointed s390x port co-maintainer David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus appointed s390x port co-maintainer Andreas Krebbel via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages