On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into something tracking down a test > failure on psim and now thing there is a > target specific issue that needs addressing.
lwsync is sync with the bit 9 set. So it should be ok as it was a reserved field and was supposed to be ignored on the hardware which did not implement those bits and have it as a sync (but I could be wrong). The Power ISA 2.05 describes the sync/lwsync behavior but I can't find where it says it is ignored if not implemented. I bet you have to goto the ISA for those processors to find what is the current behavior for sure. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
