* Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 14:01]: > >Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing. Is there > >a good reason against changing this particular warning from > >CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING? Quite a few packages in Debian fail > >to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me. However, if > >it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these > >packages. > > I cannot answer why this is a pedwarn or why C++ emits pedantic errors > by default.
Sorry for not being clearer; this question wasn't specifically directed at you. Hopefully someone else, maybe Joseph, can answer it. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
