Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | * Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 13:13]: | > | > So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because | > | > PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using | > | > pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug. | > | | > | Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing. Is there | > | a good reason against changing this particular warning from | > | CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING? Quite a few packages in Debian fail | > | to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me. However, if | > | it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these | > | packages. | > | > -pedantic asks for strict checking of rules. User should accept | > correcting their codes (or used codes) with they ask for strict checking. | | I agree, but what is happening now is that "no newline at end of file" | is an error even when -pedantic is not specified. I don't think that | is acceptable.
Then something is odd. A pedwarn is an error only when -pedantic, otherwise it should be just an unconditional warning. -- Gaby
