On 27/03/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 13:13]:
> So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because
> PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using
> pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug.
Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing. Is there
a good reason against changing this particular warning from
CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING? Quite a few packages in Debian fail
to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me. However, if
it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these
packages.
I cannot answer why this is a pedwarn or why C++ emits pedantic errors
by default. I only made current behaviour more consistent and fixed an
open and confirmed bug (one less, 2700 to go).
Cheers,
Manuel.
