* Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 13:13]:
> So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because
> PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using
> pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug.

Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing.  Is there
a good reason against changing this particular warning from
CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING?  Quite a few packages in Debian fail
to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me.  However, if
it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these
packages.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply via email to