* Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 13:13]: > So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because > PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using > pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug.
Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing. Is there a good reason against changing this particular warning from CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING? Quite a few packages in Debian fail to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me. However, if it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these packages. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
