On 3/20/07, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/20/07, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So the memory hit shouldn't be > > as big as e.g. going to 16 bit tree codes if that means increasing the size > > of most of the trees the compiler uses. > > Yes, this is true.But this could be solved if all LANG_TREE_x bits could move to language specific trees, could it?
Yes, absolutely. Cheers, Doug
