Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 3/20/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it's fair for front ends to pay for their
largesse. There are also relatively cheap changes in the C++ front end
to salvage a few codes, and postpone the day of reckoning.
I think that day of reckoning will come very soon again, with more
C++0x work, more autovect work, OpenMP 3.0, and the tuples and LTO
projects, etc., all requiring more tree codes.
For that matter, does increasing the tree code limit to 512 codes
instead of 256 actually put off the day of reckoning enough to be worth it?
- Brooks
