Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?

[Steven Bosscher]

On 3/20/07, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So the memory hit shouldn't be
> as big as e.g. going to 16 bit tree codes if that means increasing the size
> of most of the trees the compiler uses.

Yes, this is true.

But this could be solved if all LANG_TREE_x bits could move to
language specific trees, could it?

Gr.
Steven