Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:05 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > [...] | > | > | You make it sound like the standard is crystal clear on this issue, and | > | everyone who disagrees with your viewpoint are just slimeballs trying to | > | get around the clear wording of the standard. | > | > I think you're profondly mistaken in your understanding of what I wrote. | | I read it another few times, and still looks the same to me. | | "The way I see it is that people who designed and wrote the standard | offer their view and interpretation of of they wrote and some people | are determined to offer a different interpretation so that they can | claim they are well-founded to apply their transformations." | | | IE there are those whose opinion is right because "they wrote the
see, here is where you added the transmutation. -- Gaby
