[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gabriel Dos Reis) wrote on 17.07.05 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:05 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > | > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > [...] > | > > | > | You make it sound like the standard is crystal clear on this issue, > | > and | everyone who disagrees with your viewpoint are just slimeballs > | > trying to | get around the clear wording of the standard. > | > > | > I think you're profondly mistaken in your understanding of what I wrote. > | > | I read it another few times, and still looks the same to me. > | > | "The way I see it is that people who designed and wrote the standard > | offer their view and interpretation of of they wrote and some people > | are determined to offer a different interpretation so that they can > | claim they are well-founded to apply their transformations." > | > | > | IE there are those whose opinion is right because "they wrote the > > see, here is where you added the transmutation. Well, the more interesting part is the one after "and some". And I agree that it certainly reads rather insulting and confrontational - in fact, I can't see how else to interpret it. Can't we keep the personal attacks out of these discussions? MfG Kai
