On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:11:07PM +0000, Matthew Wahab wrote: > On 27/10/15 11:18, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > >> ;; ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>@@ -932,6 +934,8 @@ > >> UNSPEC_SQSHRN UNSPEC_UQSHRN > >> UNSPEC_SQRSHRN UNSPEC_UQRSHRN]) > >> > >>+(define_int_iterator SQRDMLAH [UNSPEC_SQRDMLAH UNSPEC_SQRDMLSH]) > >>+ > > > >This name does not make it clear that you will iterate over an "A" and an > >"S" form. I'd like to see a clearer naming choice, RDMAS? SQRDMLHADDSUB? etc. > > SQRDMLHADDSUB is a little difficult to read. How about SQRDMLH_AS, > to keep the link to the instruction?
Sounds good to me. Thanks, James
