On 27/10/15 11:18, James Greenhalgh wrote:
;; -------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -932,6 +934,8 @@
UNSPEC_SQSHRN UNSPEC_UQSHRN
UNSPEC_SQRSHRN UNSPEC_UQRSHRN])
+(define_int_iterator SQRDMLAH [UNSPEC_SQRDMLAH UNSPEC_SQRDMLSH])
+
This name does not make it clear that you will iterate over an "A" and an
"S" form. I'd like to see a clearer naming choice, RDMAS? SQRDMLHADDSUB? etc.
SQRDMLHADDSUB is a little difficult to read. How about SQRDMLH_AS, to keep the link
to the instruction?
Matthew
