Following the conception of a Transatlantic power cable, I just heard on the radio that a couple huge globe-ish spanning electrical-busses are under planning... one that might span from Thailand to Saudi Arabia (through northern India) with Solar (and other renewables?) tapping in along the way and load-shifting E/W with the sunlight and load.   Also maybe one that spans Australia which I believe to be about as wide as the US?

Seems like TX's problems stemming from their own (short-sighted?) self-isolation might be good hosts/promoters of such a long-throw?

I don't know what it would take to upgrade the national rail system to also be a load-balancing shadow network for renewable electricity?   I assume none of them are electrified (third rail) but maybe laying one, given the pre-existing right-of-way and regular inspection/maintenance/access available would be of interest?   But then maybe our FriAM member who is working on converting natural gas to pneumatic energy-transfer/storage knows more about all those issues?   Hybridized infrastructure across many types?

Maybe the existing Diesel-Electric Engines (most of what is on the rail) could tap in mildly to reduce diesel consumption and do their own load leveling?   Fill empty tankers with water at the top of lines (where there *is* water) and carry it to low lying land, extracting the PE from the mass/elevation drop? Reline old asphalt/fuel-oil/etc tankers and provide boutique "Rocky Mountain" (or Cascades) branch-water to the big cities while extracting (maybe) enough energy from the elevation drop to at least pay to haul the damn empties back up the hill?

 With me as the big "unintended consequence" chicken-little, I'm sure most if not all of my hare-brained schemes are truly just "asking for trouble", but I think it is inevitable that they will all be considered in the spirit of adjacent-technical-possibles...

National Railway System: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=96ec03e4fc8546bd8a864e39a2c3fc41

This fusion video should be the standard for how to present every single technological innovation, every so-called "renewable energy" device that is too little, too late, and most importantly distracts us from thinking seriously about how we shall survive climate catastrophe and continue to live a flourishing life on earth.  Thank you Carl--I think you sent this link to the group.

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:57 AM cody dooderson <[email protected]> wrote:

    I had never heard of a transatlantic power grid. That is an
    interesting idea. The sun is probably shining somewhere on the
    earth at any given time. Would a lot of energy get wasted with the
    long distances?

    On Fri, Dec 16, 2022, 10:46 AM Gillian Densmore
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        frank: ah! thanks. It seems like you've had 99 lives man.

        On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:28 AM Marcus Daniels
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            I like the idea of a large transatlantic DC power cable.  
            That would enable solar power to be distributed around the
            world.   It would reduce the need to depend on batteries
            for wind and solar.   Of course, you raise #3, so it would
            be a target for sabotage like with Nordstream.  It would
            be nice to think there are things just to valuable to
            destroy, but probably there are no such things.
            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            *From:* Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of
            Sarbajit Roy <[email protected]>
            *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 2022 12:01 AM
            *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
            <[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] technical notes on fusion announcement
            What you are missing includes
            1) Disposal of long term hazardous nuclear waste.
            2) Problems in maintaining / decommissioning ol older
            nuclear fission plants
            3) Examples like we are seeing Ukraine's nuclear plants
            caught up in a war.

            On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:59 AM Gillian Densmore
            <[email protected]> wrote:

                Ok so this is cool and all.
                Sigh I'll ask /that/ question. We want less carbons
                because the planet is on f'n fire
                <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFgBFYkBZ6E>  . As
                far as I know humans (in the very least) accelerated
                climate change. Ie we made this mess clean it up. ok
                fair so far I'm following.
                So uh why not just start with fission (breeders) ? Why
                not also put as much money into matter/anti matter as
                well as fusion? We can make minute amounts of
                antimatter in massive collider. I'd think something
                who's by product are xrays gamma and some other stuff
                with a lot of energy created would be a massive honney
                pot the department of energy would pursue as well.
                I know the answer to fission (sadly) is NIMBY. (yes
                but it's a lot cleaner and safer than oil and coal I say)
                I don't know why we haven't looked at other things as well
                What I'm saying is fusion has been humans icarus wings
                with it being just arround the corner for decades.
                while matter/anti matter is (sort of) here. Fission is
                here. Want zero carbons? cool! so why not build out a
                ton of reactors we already can do. Or am I missing
                something?

                On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 8:31 AM Marcus Daniels
                <[email protected]> wrote:

                    How ICF might evolve into a power plant:

                    https://firstlightfusion.com/technology/power-plant

                    Sent from my iPhone

                    On Dec 14, 2022, at 7:16 AM, glen
                    <[email protected]> wrote:

                    Excellent! Thanks. I think I'll have to push
                    this topic for another day. I've got a few more
                    links from other fora I'll plop here just in case
                    I only land back here if/when I pop it off the
                    stack later:

                    
https://lasers.llnl.gov/news/magnetized-targets-boost-nif-implosion-performance
                    
https://spie.org/news/nuclear-fusion-nifs-hall-of-mirrors-may-solve-worlds-energy-crisis?SSO=1
                    
https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-power-may-run-fuel-even-gets-started
                    
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/12/what-enabled-the-big-boost-in-fusion-energy-announced-this-week/

                    On 12/13/22 16:23, Steve Smith wrote:
                    I think DT refers simply to the remaining
                    fraction of Deuterium/Tritium remaining after
                    the reaction event (-4%) without specific
                    accounting for remaining D vs T.
                    My understanding is that D-T fusion occurs at a
                    lower temperature than D-D but that once fusion
                    commences (starting with D-T), both D-T and D-D
                    reactions occurring in similar amounts. In
                    laser-driven ICF (as with NIF) I believe the
                    ratio of D/T is nominally 50/50 though it would
                    seem to make sense to have a higher T to D ratio
                    but most references I see imply equal
                    portions.   An equal number of D-D and D-T
                    reactions would seem to consume D more quickly,
                    though as that commences, the D/T ratio would go
                    down, making D-T reactions (yet) more
                    likely...   tricky business, no wonder it has
                    taken decades to get to this point?
                    The Wikipedia Entry on ICF is pretty good:
                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_confinement_fusion
                    I found several popular science Articles which
                    seem to reinforce my sense that this
                    "breakthrough" is not as significant as implied:
                    
https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-breakthrough-nif-uh-not-really
                    Other interesting/relevant links regarding D-T
                    and D-D fusion...
                    
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263507001_Species_separation_and_modification_of_neutron_diagnostics_in_inertial-confinement_fusion/figures?lo=1
                    
https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions
                    
<https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions>
                    
https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html
                    
<https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html>
                    On 12/13/22 4:36 PM, glen wrote:
                    That's why I asked. I guess I'll assume DT
                    means both deuterium and tritium, not just
                    deuterium. If you were going to track fuel use,
                    you'd track the rarer part more closely, right?

                    On 12/13/22 09:22, Frank Wimberly wrote:
                    DT = deuterium?

                    ---
                    Frank C. Wimberly
                    140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
                    Santa Fe, NM 87505

                    505 670-9918
                    Santa Fe, NM

                    On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, 10:21 AM glen
                    <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    Awesome. Thanks. I'm still trying to catch up
                    with the QC Wormhole kerfuffle. Who knew
                    Quanta was so click baity?

                    What is "DT"?

                    On 12/13/22 09:02, Marcus Daniels wrote:
                    > In case no one wanted to get up at 7:00am to
                    watch DOE administrators talk:
                    >
                    >
                    > 1. Controlling the laser in space and time
                    was important for maintaining symmetry. Timing
                    precision of 25e-12 secs and laser spatial
                    precision of 5e-12 meter were needed. This was
                    thought to be the main explanation for the
                    achievement.
                    >
                    > 2. 8% more power on the laser this time
                    >
                    > 3. x-ray tomography is used to find flaws in
                    the capsules. Developing software to do the
                    counting.
                    >
                    > 4. They have ongoing efforts to study the
                    fabrication systems and their components (done
                    in Germany) to find idiosyncrasies of each.
                    >
                    > 5. Laser technology improvements since NIF
                    was built which are 20% more efficient.
                    >
                    > 6. Target cost is from labor, and it takes 7
                    months each
                    >
                    > 7. 4% of DT is burned in a shot
                    >
                    > 8. Machine learning ties together radiation
                    hydrodynamics and experimental data.   (It
                    sounded preliminary.)
                    >
                    > 9. The (successful) capsule had more defects
                    than previous experiments.   However, previous
                    experiments did show benefits from capsule
                    quality.
                    >
                    > 10. 15% of experiments are indirect drive of
                    this kind, 15% of experiments are other
                    approaches to ignition. The rest are weapons
                    and materials characterization.
                    >
                    > 11. Anomalous laser directional control were
                    problems in the summer runs.   Fixed that.


-- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

                    -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... .
                    / -.-. --- -.. .
                    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
                    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /
                      Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
                    to (un)subscribe
                    http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
                    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
                    archives:  5/2017 thru present
                    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
                    1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
                    -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... .
                    / -.-. --- -.. .
                    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
                    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe  / 
                     Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
                    to (un)subscribe
                    http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
                    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
                    archives:  5/2017 thru present
                    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
                      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

                -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
                -.-. --- -.. .
                FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
                Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  Thursdays
                9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
                to (un)subscribe
                http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
                FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
                archives:  5/2017 thru present
                https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
                  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

            -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-.
            --- -.. .
            FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
            Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
            9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
            to (un)subscribe
            http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
            FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
            archives:  5/2017 thru present
            https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
              1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

        -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
        Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
        to (un)subscribe
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
        FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
        archives:  5/2017 thru present
        https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
          1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

    -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org <http://emergentdiplomacy.org>
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

mobile:  (303) 859-5609


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to