On 12/16/22 10:56 AM, cody dooderson wrote:
I had never heard of a transatlantic power grid. That is an interesting idea. The sun is probably shining somewhere on the earth at any given time. Would a lot of energy get wasted with the long distances?


Nikola Tesla is rolling in his magnetically shielded grave hearing all this wasteful and under-inspired talk of long-range power transmission <https://theconversation.com/nikola-tesla-5g-network-could-realise-his-dream-of-wireless-electricity-a-century-after-experiments-failed-158665#:~:text=He%20theorised%20that%20electricity%20could,electricity%20supply%20were%20never%20realised.> via wires?

my SF addled brain conjures a snow-piercer <https://www.tntdrama.com/snowpiercer> style earth-circumscribing rail-line... the pylons can be driven so deep into the earth's crust that they are tapped into the earth's inner heat, the rails can be the DC conduit Marcus suggests.   There can be as many windmills and tidal turbines placed along the line as one feels they need/can-afford/stand-to-see as well as a PV/thermo solar continuous collector/shade-roof which can also enhance gradient by radiating into the  (2.73-273 deg K <https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/153839/what-is-the-temperature-of-the-clear-night-sky-from-the-surface-of-earth>) sky at night.   The Snowpiercer rail-cars can move (make them pneumatic or evacuated-ballistic (~18mi/sec?)) physical goods and materials continuously...   (thank you Elon Musk). Mount a few Spinlaunch <https://www.spinlaunch.com/> units on train units and squirt things into orbit at-will?

Wait, maybe it can become a strip-city modeled on SA's "Line" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Line,_Saudi_Arabia>... at 100 miles long and 9million population, the circumferential "line" would be 240 times as long and have a carrying capacity of >2 Billion based on their predicted precedent.    Place three of these orthogonal to one another like an armillary sphere <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armillary_sphere> and we are up to 6B?   A modest bump in scale (cube root of 1.5) could accommodate 9B!   A few of us (DaveW, GaryS, ... myself)  rebellious non-urban renegades could live in the remaining landscape NOT covered by these 3 circumscribing strip cities and live our lives in the spirit of Sean Connery's character Zed in Zardoz <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070948/>!

Heck, just a nice precursor to Larry Niven's Ringworld <https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a11183/could-we-build-a-ringworld-17166651/>   tell Musk he can keep his claims to Mars... at least until the rest of us need the mass to integrate into a proper Dyson Sphere <https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a11098/dyson-sphere/>...


On Fri, Dec 16, 2022, 10:46 AM Gillian Densmore <[email protected]> wrote:

    frank: ah! thanks. It seems like you've had 99 lives man.

    On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:28 AM Marcus Daniels
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        I like the idea of a large transatlantic DC power cable.  
        That would enable solar power to be distributed around the
        world.   It would reduce the need to depend on batteries for
        wind and solar.   Of course, you raise #3, so it would be a
        target for sabotage like with Nordstream.  It would be nice to
        think there are things just to valuable to destroy, but
        probably there are no such things.
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From:* Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of
        Sarbajit Roy <[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 2022 12:01 AM
        *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
        <[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] technical notes on fusion announcement
        What you are missing includes
        1) Disposal of long term hazardous nuclear waste.
        2) Problems in maintaining / decommissioning ol older nuclear
        fission plants
        3) Examples like we are seeing Ukraine's nuclear plants caught
        up in a war.

        On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:59 AM Gillian Densmore
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            Ok so this is cool and all.
            Sigh I'll ask /that/ question. We want less carbons
            because the planet is on f'n fire
            <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFgBFYkBZ6E>  . As far as
            I know humans (in the very least) accelerated climate
            change. Ie we made this mess clean it up. ok fair so far
            I'm following.
            So uh why not just start with fission (breeders) ? Why not
            also put as much money into matter/anti matter as well as
            fusion? We can make minute amounts of antimatter in
            massive collider. I'd think something who's by product are
            xrays gamma and some other stuff with a lot of energy
            created would be a massive honney pot the department of
            energy would pursue as well.
            I know the answer to fission (sadly) is NIMBY. (yes but
            it's a lot cleaner and safer than oil and coal I say)
            I don't know why we haven't looked at other things as well
            What I'm saying is fusion has been humans icarus wings
            with it being just arround the corner for decades. while
            matter/anti matter is (sort of) here. Fission is here.
            Want zero carbons? cool! so why not build out a ton of
            reactors we already can do. Or am I missing something?

            On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 8:31 AM Marcus Daniels
            <[email protected]> wrote:

                How ICF might evolve into a power plant:

                https://firstlightfusion.com/technology/power-plant

                Sent from my iPhone

                On Dec 14, 2022, at 7:16 AM, glen
                <[email protected]> wrote:

                Excellent! Thanks. I think I'll have to push this
                topic for another day. I've got a few more links from
                other fora I'll plop here just in case I only land
                back here if/when I pop it off the stack later:

                
https://lasers.llnl.gov/news/magnetized-targets-boost-nif-implosion-performance
                
https://spie.org/news/nuclear-fusion-nifs-hall-of-mirrors-may-solve-worlds-energy-crisis?SSO=1
                
https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-power-may-run-fuel-even-gets-started
                
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/12/what-enabled-the-big-boost-in-fusion-energy-announced-this-week/

                On 12/13/22 16:23, Steve Smith wrote:
                I think DT refers simply to the remaining fraction
                of Deuterium/Tritium remaining after the reaction
                event (-4%) without specific accounting for
                remaining D vs T.
                My understanding is that D-T fusion occurs at a
                lower temperature than D-D but that once fusion
                commences (starting with D-T), both D-T and D-D
                reactions occurring in similar amounts. In
                laser-driven ICF (as with NIF) I believe the ratio
                of D/T is nominally 50/50 though it would seem to
                make sense to have a higher T to D ratio but most
                references I see imply equal portions.   An equal
                number of D-D and D-T reactions would seem to
                consume D more quickly, though as that commences,
                the D/T ratio would go down, making D-T reactions
                (yet) more likely...   tricky business, no wonder it
                has taken decades to get to this point?
                The Wikipedia Entry on ICF is pretty good:
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_confinement_fusion
                I found several popular science Articles which seem
                to reinforce my sense that this "breakthrough" is
                not as significant as implied:
                
https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-breakthrough-nif-uh-not-really
                Other interesting/relevant links regarding D-T and
                D-D fusion...
                
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263507001_Species_separation_and_modification_of_neutron_diagnostics_in_inertial-confinement_fusion/figures?lo=1
                
https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions
                
<https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions>
                
https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html
                
<https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html>
                On 12/13/22 4:36 PM, glen wrote:
                That's why I asked. I guess I'll assume DT means
                both deuterium and tritium, not just deuterium. If
                you were going to track fuel use, you'd track the
                rarer part more closely, right?

                On 12/13/22 09:22, Frank Wimberly wrote:
                DT = deuterium?

                ---
                Frank C. Wimberly
                140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
                Santa Fe, NM 87505

                505 670-9918
                Santa Fe, NM

                On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, 10:21 AM glen
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Awesome. Thanks. I'm still trying to catch up with
                the QC Wormhole kerfuffle. Who knew Quanta was so
                click baity?

                What is "DT"?

                On 12/13/22 09:02, Marcus Daniels wrote:
                > In case no one wanted to get up at 7:00am to
                watch DOE administrators talk:
                >
                >
                > 1. Controlling the laser in space and time was
                important for maintaining symmetry.  Timing
                precision of 25e-12 secs and laser spatial
                precision of 5e-12 meter were needed. This was
                thought to be the main explanation for the
                achievement.
                >
                > 2. 8% more power on the laser this time
                >
                > 3. x-ray tomography is used to find flaws in the
                capsules.  Developing software to do the counting.
                >
                > 4. They have ongoing efforts to study the
                fabrication systems and their components (done in
                Germany) to find idiosyncrasies of each.
                >
                > 5. Laser technology improvements since NIF was
                built which are 20% more efficient.
                >
                > 6. Target cost is from labor, and it takes 7
                months each
                >
                > 7. 4% of DT is burned in a shot
                >
                > 8. Machine learning ties together radiation
                hydrodynamics and experimental data.   (It sounded
                preliminary.)
                >
                > 9. The (successful) capsule had more defects
                than previous experiments. However, previous
                experiments did show benefits from capsule quality.
                >
                > 10. 15% of experiments are indirect drive of
                this kind, 15% of experiments are other approaches
                to ignition.  The rest are weapons and materials
                characterization.
                >
                > 11. Anomalous laser directional control were
                problems in the summer runs.   Fixed that.


-- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

                -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
                -.-. --- -.. .
                FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
                Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
                9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
                to (un)subscribe
                http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
                FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
                archives:  5/2017 thru present
                https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
                1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
                -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
                -.-. --- -.. .
                FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
                Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  Thursdays
                9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
                to (un)subscribe
                http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
                FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
                archives:  5/2017 thru present
                https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
                  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

            -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-.
            --- -.. .
            FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
            Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  Thursdays 9a-12p
            Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
            to (un)subscribe
            http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
            FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
            archives:  5/2017 thru present
            https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
              1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

        -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
        Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
        to (un)subscribe
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
        FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
        archives:  5/2017 thru present
        https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
          1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

    -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to