Hello Bruce, 

Thank you very much for the update. 

Best 
Paul

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message  
From: Bruce Fischl
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 8:20 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Reply To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: cortical/subcortical volume based analysis

Hi Paul

I was waiting for Lilla to respond :)
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude 
wrote:

> Hello Bruce, 
> 
> I wasn't sure if you answered my previous message hence, I'm sending it 
> again. Thank you.  
> 
> Best, 
> Paul
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: miracle ozzoude <miracoo...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical/subcortical volume based analysis
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> 
> 
> Hello Bruce, 
> Thank you for the response. I was able to look into CVS command and I wrote a 
> command on how to
> register each subjects to cvs_avg35_inMNI152 template using the following: 
> mri_cvs_register --mov
> subID --mni /Application/freesurfer/subjects/cvs_avg35_inMNI152/T1.mgz 
> --step1 --step2 --step3
> --outdir  $SUBJECTS_DIR/$subID/cvs  --asegfname aparc+aseg --openmp 8. Do i 
> need to use the T1 in
> the mri folder or mri.2mm folder when performing mri_cvs_register?
> 
> My next goals are to: 
> 1) sample the volumes created using mri_cvs_register to the 
> cvs_avg35_inMNI152 template using
> mri_vol2vol -reg .
>     -which of the outputs from mri_cvs_register should i use
> to 
> achieve?final_CVSmorphed_toTEMPLATE_norm.mgz,final_CVSmorph_toTEMPLATE.m3z, or
> final_CVSmorphed_toTEMPLATE_aseg.mgz
> 2)Use a cortical+subcortical mask from cvs_avg35_inMNI152 to smooth the 
> output from mri_vol2vol. 
>       - How can I create the cortical mask from the 
> cvs_avg35_inMNI152/mri.2mm folder? This is
> because the folder already has a subcortical mask and I want to create a 
> cortical mask, combine both
> (using mri_merge) and use it to smooth with 8mm. 
> 
> 3) Lastly, use mri_concat to combine the smoothened maps in order to perform 
> group level analysis on
> them. 
>       - when performing mri_glmfit on the combined maps, i don't need to 
> specify the --surf
> fsaverage and lh/rh flags because it is a volume based analysis and it was 
> done on MNI template not
> fsaverage? 
> 
> Thank you very much
> 
> Best, 
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
> wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> I guess you could use CVS for this.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:
>
> Hello Bruce, 
>
> Thank you very much. Can I still general cortical and subcortical maps with
> the Spherical warp of r/lh.white surface?  If yes, please what are the steps
> to achieve this? can I still analyze it with mri_glm?
>
> Best, 
> Paul
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>   Original Message  
> From: Bruce Fischl
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2017 11:27 AM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Reply To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical/subcortical volume based analysis
>
> Hi Paul
>
> if you use a property (like gm) to drive intersubject registration it then
> becomes difficult to also analyze it. If your warp was truly perfect you
> could just analyze the properties of the warp, but even then it is hard to
> localize effects (e.g. if you changed the smoothness of the warp field
> would the effect move somewhere else?). If the warp is not perfect then
> some of the effect is in your warp and some in the residual anatomical
> differences. There are lots of caveats like this you have to worry about.
> It's the reason we drive our spherical warp with the ?h.white surface. It
> is invariant to gm atrophy and so can be used to assess it without worrying
> about this kind of thing
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> 
> 
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:
>
> Hello Bruce,  
>
> Thank you for the response. I meant the latter ( making maps
> etc). I want to do something similar to the subcortical volume
> based analysis on PETSurfer page however, on freesurfer T1.
> Freesurfer doesn't perform VBM hence, why should there be a
> problem with interpretation? 
>
> Best, 
> Miracle
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>   Original Message  
> From: Bruce Fischl
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 6:53 PM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Reply To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical/subcortical volume based
> analysis
>
> Hi Paul
>
> we typically do this type of analysis by looking at scatter
> plots of
> structure volumes (e.g. hippocampus). Alternatively, you can
> make maps,
> but that opens up all the problems/difficulties of
> interpretation of VBM.
> Which did you mean?
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:
>
> Hello FreeSurfer experts, 
> I want to perform a whole brain volume based group
> analysis for cortical and subcortical regions.
> That's something very similar to surface based group
> analysis for cortical thickness however, for
> volume. Is there a tutorial on how to do it? if yes,
> please can i get the link. If not, please can
> someone direct me how to go about doing it? My goal
> is to perform a group comparison between control
> and PD patients based on volume. Thank you very
> much. 
>
> Best, 
> Paul 
> 
> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to