Hi Paul

I was waiting for Lilla to respond :)
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:

Hello Bruce, 

I wasn't sure if you answered my previous message hence, I'm sending it again. 
Thank you.  

Best, 
Paul

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: miracle ozzoude <miracoo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical/subcortical volume based analysis
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>


Hello Bruce, 
Thank you for the response. I was able to look into CVS command and I wrote a 
command on how to
register each subjects to cvs_avg35_inMNI152 template using the following: 
mri_cvs_register --mov
subID --mni /Application/freesurfer/subjects/cvs_avg35_inMNI152/T1.mgz --step1 
--step2 --step3
--outdir  $SUBJECTS_DIR/$subID/cvs  --asegfname aparc+aseg --openmp 8. Do i 
need to use the T1 in
the mri folder or mri.2mm folder when performing mri_cvs_register?

My next goals are to: 
1) sample the volumes created using mri_cvs_register to the cvs_avg35_inMNI152 
template using
mri_vol2vol -reg .
    -which of the outputs from mri_cvs_register should i use
to achieve?final_CVSmorphed_toTEMPLATE_norm.mgz,final_CVSmorph_toTEMPLATE.m3z, 
or
final_CVSmorphed_toTEMPLATE_aseg.mgz
2)Use a cortical+subcortical mask from cvs_avg35_inMNI152 to smooth the output 
from mri_vol2vol. 
      - How can I create the cortical mask from the cvs_avg35_inMNI152/mri.2mm 
folder? This is
because the folder already has a subcortical mask and I want to create a 
cortical mask, combine both
(using mri_merge) and use it to smooth with 8mm. 

3) Lastly, use mri_concat to combine the smoothened maps in order to perform 
group level analysis on
them. 
      - when performing mri_glmfit on the combined maps, i don't need to 
specify the --surf
fsaverage and lh/rh flags because it is a volume based analysis and it was done 
on MNI template not
fsaverage? 

Thank you very much

Best, 
Paul


On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
wrote:
      Hi Paul

      I guess you could use CVS for this.

      cheers
      Bruce
      On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:

            Hello Bruce, 

            Thank you very much. Can I still general cortical and subcortical 
maps with
            the Spherical warp of r/lh.white surface?  If yes, please what are 
the steps
            to achieve this? can I still analyze it with mri_glm?

            Best, 
            Paul

            Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
              Original Message  
            From: Bruce Fischl
            Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2017 11:27 AM
            To: Freesurfer support list
            Reply To: Freesurfer support list
            Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical/subcortical volume based analysis

            Hi Paul

            if you use a property (like gm) to drive intersubject registration 
it then
            becomes difficult to also analyze it. If your warp was truly 
perfect you
            could just analyze the properties of the warp, but even then it is 
hard to
            localize effects (e.g. if you changed the smoothness of the warp 
field
            would the effect move somewhere else?). If the warp is not perfect 
then
            some of the effect is in your warp and some in the residual 
anatomical
            differences. There are lots of caveats like this you have to worry 
about.
            It's the reason we drive our spherical warp with the ?h.white 
surface. It
            is invariant to gm atrophy and so can be used to assess it without 
worrying
            about this kind of thing

            cheers
            Bruce



            On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:

                  Hello Bruce,  

                  Thank you for the response. I meant the latter ( making maps
                  etc). I want to do something similar to the subcortical volume
                  based analysis on PETSurfer page however, on freesurfer T1.
                  Freesurfer doesn't perform VBM hence, why should there be a
                  problem with interpretation? 

                  Best, 
                  Miracle

                  Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
                    Original Message  
                  From: Bruce Fischl
                  Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 6:53 PM
                  To: Freesurfer support list
                  Reply To: Freesurfer support list
                  Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical/subcortical volume based
                  analysis

                  Hi Paul

                  we typically do this type of analysis by looking at scatter
                  plots of
                  structure volumes (e.g. hippocampus). Alternatively, you can
                  make maps,
                  but that opens up all the problems/difficulties of
                  interpretation of VBM.
                  Which did you mean?
                  cheers
                  Bruce

                  On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, miracle ozzoude wrote:

                        Hello FreeSurfer experts, 
                        I want to perform a whole brain volume based group
                        analysis for cortical and subcortical regions.
                        That's something very similar to surface based group
                        analysis for cortical thickness however, for
                        volume. Is there a tutorial on how to do it? if yes,
                        please can i get the link. If not, please can
                        someone direct me how to go about doing it? My goal
                        is to perform a group comparison between control
                        and PD patients based on volume. Thank you very
                        much. 

                        Best, 
                        Paul 



                  _______________________________________________
                  Freesurfer mailing list
                  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
                  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer




            _______________________________________________
            Freesurfer mailing list
            Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
            https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.





_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to