Hi Chintan

(a) yes, I would think fsaverage would be fine in this age range

(b) we do *not* resample into talairach coords, so volumes and surface areas should include eIV or something equivalent as a covariate. Thickness shouldn't require it.

cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Mehta, Chintan wrote:


Dear FreeSurfer users,


I am new to surface based analysis in FreeSurfer (version 6.0). My data 
consists of T1-weighted scan
from normally developing youth of 8 to 21 years of age. I have two questions on 
assumptions of this
analysis for pediatric data:


(a) Is "fsaverage" an appropriate common template for all subjects of ages 8 to 
21? Online tutorials
suggest that fsaverage is the most commonly used template in FreeSurfer 
analyses and, furthermore,
imply that FreeSurfer can be used on scans of normally developing children as 
young as five years
old.


I am running analyses separately over different age groups (like ages 8 to 12,  
13 to 16, 17 to 21)
to ensure robustness. However, would combining results be inaccurate? 


(b) Previous posts in this forum and FreeSurfer documentation strongly 
recommend somehow normalizing
for head size or total brain volume in models of ROI area/volume. Would the 
eTIV covariate also be
appropriate for surface-based analysis of scans registered to fsaverage when 
using mri_glmfit? 

To me, it appears that scans registered to fsaverage have been warped to 
Talairach space, so the
whole brain adjustment has been implicitly made.


Thank you in advance for your great insights!

 

Best,

Chintan


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to