On 05/22/2013 01:43 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
>
>             >     1) In a design with group and gender as discrete
>         factors and age
>             >     as a continuous factor, why is it that QDEC only
>         displays the
>             >     contrast "Does the avg thickness, accounting for
>         gender, differ
>             >     between group1 and group2?" and not also
>         "..acounting for gender
>             >     and age,.."?
>             >
>             I thought that it would have. Are you coding age as a nuisance
>             variable?
>             Also, are you coding gender as a continuous variable? That is
>             something
>             you should not do.
>
>
>         I was not coding age as a nuisance variable but as a
>         continuous variable (co-variate). Gender was a discrete/fixed
>         factor but I'm not sure whether this means 'continuous' in the
>         sense discussed in your exchange with Arman. Anyway, in this
>         configuration, it seems gender and age are not accounted
>         (controlled) for at the same time.
>
>     It should be. Can you send your qdec table?
>
> See attached
>
>
>
>             >     3) From the group tutorial, I see that mris_preproc
>         has to be
>             >     called with flag "--cache-in
>         ess.fwhm10thickn.fsaverage".
>             However,
>             >     after running recon-all (including with the –qcache
>         option)
>             on all
>             >     my subjects, none of their folders contains a file named
>             >     ?h.thickness.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh
>             >
>             Where does it say to use ess.fwhm10thickn.fsaverage?
>
>         Sorry, typo. The flag is actually "--cache-in
>         thickness.fwhm10.fsaverage", I file that I do not have after
>         having run recon-all (including with the --qcache option)
>
>     Try running recon-all again with just the --qcache flag.
>
> This is what I had done previously; the command was:
> recon-all -s C${i} -qcache
> where the ${i} was a counter in a script, to run the command on all my 
> subjects
what files did it create? Please submit this as a separate question, too 
hard to follow with all this other stuff.
>
>
>
>             >     5) What is the difference between running
>             make_average_subject and
>             >     running mris_preproc with --target fsaverage?
>             >
>             make average subject makes the average subject. mris_preproc
>             samples the
>             data into a common space defined by the registration
>         surface and
>             concatenates the input subjects into a single stack.
>
>         But should the registration surface used by mris_preproc (i.e.
>         its "--target" flag) come from the 'average' subject or from
>         'fsaverage'? In other words, which one of these becomes the
>         study-specific template?
>
>     You have to tell mris_preproc both the target and the surface
>     registration to use if you  want to use a different average subject.
>
> The command I used is:
>
> mris_preproc --fsgd group_gender__age.fsgd --target average --hemi rh 
> --meas thickness --out rh.thickness.mgh
>
> So if I understand correctly, the fact that I didn't indicate a 
> surface registration means that the surface from the "average" subject 
> will be used, rather than the one from "fsaverage"? I still don't 
> understand the difference between those two, and which, if any, can be 
> referred to as the study-specific template.
If you want to use a different subject, you need to spec the surface 
registration for that subject and that subject as a target. If you only 
spec --target and the target is an average you have created with 
make_average_subject, then it is effectly the same as just using 
fsaverage because the registration to fsaverage is used.
>
>         B) All concatenated volumes from mris_preproc's output files
>         (?h.thickness.mgh) appear blank in freeview, even though the
>         individual structurals all look fine. Also, lh.thickness.mgh
>         and rh.thickness.mgh have, surprisingly, *exactly* the same
>         file size, which is also a bit small (~25MB) to be able to
>         contain 38 registered structurals, which suggests something
>         went wrong...
>
>     These are surface overlay files, not volumes. You can't load
>     surfaces as volumes in freeview.
>
> So assuming I don't visually inspect the surface overlays, can I 
> assume that mris_preproc ran fine if lh.thickness.mgh and 
> rh.thickness.mgh have exactly the same file size?
yes
>
>         C) When running mri_surf2surf, I get an error saying that file
>         /surf/lh.white cannot be opened. The 'average' folder produced
>         after I ran make_average_subject does not contain a
>         /surf/lh.white file, only a /surf/lh.white_avg file! I didn’t
>         find a log file from make_average_subject so i don’t know if
>         it gave any errors..
>
>     It's extremely helpful to have command lines ...
>
>
> Sorry, my commands were:
> make_average_subject --subjects C01 C02 C03 C04 C05 C06 C07 C08 C09 
> C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 M01 M02 M03 M04 M05 M06 M07 
> M08 M09 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 M15 M16 M17 M18 M19
> mri_surf2surf --hemi lh --s average --sval lh.thickness.mgh --fwhm 10 
> --tval lh.thickness.10.mgh
It might be a version problem. You can create a symbolic link from 
lh.white_avg to lh.white
> _________________________
>
> Could someone please explain how the following descriptions of a 
> contrast are exactly linked:
> i) a contrast's namesake folder (including keywords 'Avg'/'Diff'/'X' 
> and 'Intercept'/'Cor'; e.g. 
> "lh-Diff-group1-group2-Cor-thickness-behaviouralMeasure"),
> ii) its phrasing in QDEC ("Does the thickness-age correlation differ 
> between group1 and group2?"),
> iii) the assignment of values to each column of the design matrix, in 
> the C.dat contrast vector (e.g. [0, 0, 1, -1])
>
> _________________________
> (this is actually a bug report) After setting a different FDR 
> threshold and pressing the "Set Using FDR" button, more often than not 
> the results image doesn’t change accordingly. I noticed that the 
> button only has an effect after moving around the QDEC window and/or 
> waiting a minute or so

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to