Hi Mike, I *think* I've found the problem with this subject. The way 
that the volume inside the white surface is computed is to create a 
high-res volume (.25mm iso), then create a shell based on the 
intersection of the faces with the volume. The outside of the shell is 
"flooded", the result is inverted to give a map of voxels inside the 
white surface. This includes subcortical voxels, so the voxels known to 
be in the WM from the aseg are added. The .25mm voxels that are labeled 
as cortical gray matter are also included since these represent partial 
volume that are really WM. So far so good. I think the problem is that 
the shell for this subject has a hole in it, so the flood leaks into 
most the interior. When inverted, there are very few voxels left and so 
the WM volume is way too low. It might take a while to find a solution 
to this, so I just wanted to give you a heads up. One possible 
work-around is to make an edit that causes the surface to change. It is 
probably the case that even a small change causes the hole to fill and 
everything works out.

doug

Michael Harms wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone have a chance to look at this?  Should we just forget about
> trying to get an accurate lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol value for this
> subject?
>
> thanks,
> -MH
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:35 -0600, Michael Harms wrote:
>   
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We have a subject processed with FS v5.1 in which
>> lhCorticalWhiteMatterVol in aseg.stats is much too low -- only 33781
>> mm^3.  From what I see, the aseg.mgz looks fine.  'mris_volume lh.white'
>> returns 287261 and running mri_segstats without the --excl-ctxgmwm
>> option returns a Left-Cerebral-White-Matter volume of 245169.
>> 'mris_euler_number' indicates no problems with lh.white.
>>
>> Running 'mris_wm_volume' on its own generates the same value of 33781.
>> I also tried running 'mris_wm_volume' with the -v option to see if any
>> interesting messages popped up, but got the message "unknown option -v".
>>
>> Any idea what is going wrong here?  So you can see for yourself, I went
>> ahead and uploaded the subject's processed data to your FTP server
>> (110107_L206.tgz)
>>
>> thanks,
>> -MH
>>
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>   

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to