On Saturday, December 2, 2017 8:01 AM, Baho Utot stated: > On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning > >> how to use an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively > >> small > home network. > >> > > poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features > > that I don't exactly use, but it's certainly not industrial-sized. I > > had the same impression of a monstrosity before I started using it > > myself, on my *laptop* of all things. > >> Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", > >> "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has > >> done a pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent. > >> Which brings me to what happens if I do embrace "poudriere". How long > >> before that becomes history also? > >> > > portmgr officially maintains and promotes poudriere. It's not going > > anywhere until they say it is. > > > > Sorry tired of playing games, leaving FreeBSD as we speak
I am going to give them a chance to get synth back up and running. If not, then I am out of her too. -- Carmel C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
