On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote:
On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote:
Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use
an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home network.

poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features
that I don't exactly use, but it's certainly not industrial-sized. I had
the same impression of a monstrosity before I started using it myself,
on my *laptop* of all things.
Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager",
"portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has done a
pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent. Which brings me
to what happens if I do embrace "poudriere". How long before that becomes
history also?

portmgr officially maintains and promotes poudriere. It's not going
anywhere until they say it is.


Sorry tired of playing games,  leaving FreeBSD as we speak
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to