On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use > an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home > network. > poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features that I don't exactly use, but it's certainly not industrial-sized. I had the same impression of a monstrosity before I started using it myself, on my *laptop* of all things. > Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", > "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has done a > pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent. Which brings me > to what happens if I do embrace "poudriere". How long before that becomes > history also? > portmgr officially maintains and promotes poudriere. It's not going anywhere until they say it is.
-- Charlie Li Can't think of a witty .sigline today… (This email address is for mailing list use only; replace local-part with vishwin for off-list communication)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
