Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Tony Finch wrote: > >> Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename >> already existing? > >Why not just read the man page for rename(2) before making >suggestions? I did. I'm glad I was right that it's deleting the destination that is the problem. I would have thought it would be easy to be sure that spool filenames are unique, but OTOH I guess that's not completely robust. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GERMAN BIGHT: SOUTHERLY BECOMING CYCLONIC THEN MAINLY NORTHERLY 5 TO 7, PERHAPS GALE 8 LATER. RAIN. MAINLY MODERATE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: soft updates performance Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates performance Greg Black
- Re: soft updates performance Kent Stewart
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... mouss
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Julian Elischer
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Mike Silbersack
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Andre Oppermann