On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > I did a quick search of the qmail site but couldn't find an email > address to report the FAQ issue to. If QMail calls fsync() in a > reasonable manner, then softupdates is perfectly safe and the QMail > FAQ needs to be updated to recommend softupdates rather then > disrecommend it. > > -Matt The question still reamins about link/unlink/rename. Is a fsync of the directory necessary to ensure that they completed properly? As they take filenames instead of fds, an fsync after the operation seems non-intuitive. The rename manpage seems to imply that the operation is synchronous - the other two are ambiguous. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Julian Elischer
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Mike Silbersack
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Jos Backus