Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Charles Randall writes: > >The qmail FAQ specifically recommends against soft updates for the mail > >queue. > > > >http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html#filesystems > > > >Is this incorrect? > > > > It seems to indicate that qmail doesn't use fsync(2) as much as it should > do. If that is true, then yes, softupdates would mean that a lot of things > which qmail (mistakenly) think has been written are in fact not on the > disk. Qmail uses fsync() *very* extensivly! I know pretty well, I wrote the qmail-ldap patch. (avail on http://www.nrg4u.com). PS: Poul, have you got my email from yesterday night? -- Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... mouss
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qma... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Julian Elischer
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Mike Silbersack
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Jos Backus