mouss wrote: > At 21:25 07/02/01 +1000, Greg Black wrote: > >Tony Finch wrote: > > > > > Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename > > > already existing? > > > >Why not just read the man page for rename(2) before making > >suggestions? > > I find nothing convincing in the manpage. Could you please tell > what I am missing. Read the man page, and concentrate on the second sentence under the Description heading. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Aleksandr A.Babaylov
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Matt Dillon
- soft updates performance Greg Black
- Re: soft updates performance Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates performance Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates performance Greg Black
- Re: soft updates performance Kent Stewart
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... mouss
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE:... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pro... Julian Elischer
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problem... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann